Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
In 2025, deepfake-enabled fraud increased sharply, changing how attackers operate. This threat is now a top concern in cybersecurity predictions for 2026. Security teams, insurers, and brokers are working hard to keep up. One threat dominates. Deepfake-as-a-service has unleashed mass-market crimeware at alarming speed. The barrier for high-impact impersonation has plummeted. Attackers accelerate their cycles faster than ever.
Cyble’s new threat monitoring report highlights this change. It says AI deepfakes were used in “over 30% of high-impact corporate impersonation attacks in 2025.” This shows a new level of risk as many companies now face convincing voice and video scams.
Deepfake-As-A-Service Went Mainstream Fast
In 2025, deepfake-as-a-service platforms grew quickly. They offered voice cloning, video cloning, and persona simulation, all packaged for easy use.
This easy access changed how criminals operate. They now spend less time building their tools and more time choosing targets and testing reactions. This approach often focuses on high-value positions.
Cyble highlights executive exposure as a major risk. These dangers are real and happening now, including “deepfake scams,” “targeted attacks,” and increased dark web activity focused on leadership. Claims trends in fraud losses now confirm just how real the threat has become.
Synthetic Identities Powered The Fraud Engine
Attackers paired deepfakes with synthetic identities. They stitched real data with AI-generated media. They used that mix for account access and trust building.
Cyble describes “fake identities” as a major driver of deepfake-enabled fraud. These personas often look consistent across channels. They can pass casual scrutiny from busy staff.
Fraud is now an urgent process vulnerability. An employee sees a familiar face on video. A caller sounds exactly like a known executive. The request arrives—urgent, insistent, and seemingly undeniable.
That combination triggers predictable failures. People comply with authority. People follow routines under stress. Attackers exploit both.
High-Impact Scenarios Spread Across Industries
Deepfake incidents hit many sectors in 2025. Corporate finance teams faced payment diversion and invoice scams. Healthcare teams faced patient data and supplier fraud. Government teams faced identity deception and misinformation.
Cyble’s examples highlight breadth and speed. Corporate fraud leads the list. Attackers used executive voice and video to approve transfers. Political influence campaigns also used synthetic media. Financial fraud used live impersonation to challenge authentication.
Social platforms amplified the damage. AI content flooded feeds and chats. Verification slowed down during fast-moving events. Communications teams struggled under pressure.
Get The Cyber Insurance Upload Delivered
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Detection Tools Fell Behind The Models
Security controls often missed the new artifacts. Deepfake quality improved faster than standard detection methods. Attackers also tuned outputs to evade automated filters.
Cyble warns: modern deepfake videos can bypass some tools with “over 90% accuracy.” Overreliance on scanners could prove catastrophic. Only robust process controls stand between firms and major losses.
Teams now need layered defense. They need monitoring that spots targeting signals early. They also need strong verification for sensitive actions.
Cybersecurity Predictions 2026: Four Predictions That Matter To Insurers
Cyble’s 2026 outlook points to four themes.
- First, scaled social engineering. Attackers will run hyper-realistic campaigns across many targets. They will tailor voices and faces to internal org charts.
- Second, real-time financial fraud. Criminals will impersonate staff or clients during live calls. They will exploit payment workflows and help desks.
- Third, a content verification crunch. Firms will struggle to confirm authenticity fast. Leaders will hesitate during incidents and crises.
- Fourth, rising governance and labeling. Cyble expects more use of content credentials and labeling. Regulators and platforms will push disclosure rules.
These shifts urgently impact cyber liability insurance posture. Underwriters will now demand stronger identity verification and require documented payment controls.
Watch our Podcast on AI Risk: The Insurance Industry Faces a Faster, Bigger Ransomware Repeat
Controls That Reduce Deepfake Losses Now
Cyble’s guidance centers on practical safeguards.
- Use out-of-band verification for money movement. Confirm wire instructions through a separate trusted channel. Make the callback mandatory for high-risk requests.
- Add multi-layer authentication with human checks. Use strong identity steps for account changes. Limit overrides and log approvals.
- Train staff with modern scenarios. Teach teams to question unusual requests. Drill on urgency language and executive impersonation.
- Monitor leadership exposure across platforms. Track impersonation attempts and brand abuse. Remove fraudulent profiles fast when possible.
- Plan for takedown and communications. Prepare response playbooks for fake videos and audio. Coordinate legal, PR, and security early.
These steps support both risk reduction and claim defensibility. They also align with common policy conditions. They can limit the size of fraud losses.
What Cyber Liability Insurance Readers Should Watch Next
Expect more claims tied to social engineering losses. Expect more disputes over verification procedures and more focus on funds-transfer controls during renewals.
Deepfake-as-a-service will rapidly escalate in 2026. Attackers will move aggressively, testing new tactics and lures. Organizations must deploy swift detection and enforce disciplined approvals—immediately.
This is a critical moment. Synthetic identity fraud is attacking trust itself, right now. Organizations must urgently safeguard trust with process, training, and intelligence—there is no time to waste.
Related Cyber Liability Insurance Posts
