BOXX Buys Templarbit, Latest Example of Cyber Insurers Fusing Risk Intel/Protection & Coverage

Financial terms of the transaction were not released. Boxx appears to have wanted the target’s cybersecurity talent as well as the company & its IP. Templarbits CEO/co-founder will head up Boxx’s new R&D effort. “…BOXX has announced the acquisition of Templarbit and the creation of a new R&D Division to deliver effective        … Read more

Time for a “Parametric Approach” to Cyber Insurance? 

The growing legal and technical complexities of cyber insurance policies might be addressed by a simpler process. “’In this respect, we see an interesting trend that we definitely follow and promote, [and that is] a parametric approach. Since many of the cyber events are really black and white, I think a clear claim settlement process … Read more

Growing Reliance on Stand-Alone Cyber Insurance Policies Questioned by New Book 

Josephine Wolff offers the critique in her well-researched book, Cyberinsurance Policy: Rethinking Risk in an Age of Ransomware, Computer Fraud, Data Breaches, and Cyberattacks (MIT Press, 2022). Are insurers and insurtech companies placing too much emphasis on narrowly-defined cyber coverage, security controls and hacking data and not enough on holistic underwriting? “In trying to treat … Read more

Settlement by Zurich to Accelerate Tighter Insurance Exclusions for Nation/State-linked Cyber Attacks 

Insurers have tried to avoid paying claims related to Russia’s NotPetya cyber attacks on Ukrainian targets. “Now, however, it’s increasingly clear insurers aren’t off the hook for NotPetya payouts or from covering losses from other attacks with clear links to nation-state hackers…” “’We’re going to need to rethink what act of war means in cyberspace … Read more

When Does It Make Sense to Use Captives for Cyber Insurance? 

This report, written by the team @TheGrahamCo, casts doubt on using a “new captive” for cyber risk, as captives are commonly used for “high-frequency, low-severity” claims, while cyber attacks are often low-frequency and high-severity. Captives make more sense if they’re “mature” and have enough surplus capital to cover substantial losses. “If your organization has a … Read more

×